It’s difficult to know the right path to take when you’re pursuing a ludicrous career in fiction. For a long time, you make no money at all, and pass the time pouring your days into work that gets sent to people whose replies, cunningly impersonal though they may be, essentially boil down to “No one wants to read this.”

But writing is personally rewarding, and besides, that voice inside keeps telling you these people are fucktards and you are talented and one day they will realize this and go “Oh, why couldn’t I see this at the time” while weeping big salty tears into their tea, which you’ll never get to see unless you keep it up. That would be the greatest tragedy of all.

What do you do after failing for a while, then? Try something new. A new novel. Or set aside the long form for a while and crank out some short stories, then when those all rack up rejections until you’ve lost all faith, sit down and consume 3-9 months producing another novel no one wants to read, and once you confirm that it’s time to go out and plow through another half dozen stories. Because trying the same thing you failed at last time would just be crazy: just think about all the exciting new ways you can find to fail.

Rather than admitting you’re just mucking around blindly, it’s nice to pretend to have some sort of goal.

When I got through revisions of my last book around September ’07, I sat back and thought “Well, this pretty much kicks ass. Time to write some short stories and finally get them published so agents will take me more seriously when I start sending this around.”

That was my goal: get 3-4 short stories published somewhere, anywhere really, just something I could write on a cover letter besides my college lit mag. I’d done plenty of literary fiction in college workshops and a few more in the years after, but these were the first SFF shorts I’d written. I had my first acceptance appear in the April ’08 issue of Reflection’s Edge, thought “Well, that’s fucking awesome, and so am I,” then didn’t sell anything else until I sent another to RE for their October issue. Months pass; nothing. (By nothing I mean I sent lots around and grew increasingly confused as to how everyone else could possibly be that stupid and/or I could possibly be that bad.)

Sale to M-Brane SF mid-February. Sweet. Keep writing at my fairly slow pace. Sale in late April to OG’s Speculative Fiction–well booyah. Over the next two weeks, I land pieces on Tower of Light and The Future Fire. That’s six stories in five markets; none of them are monsters, but together they’ll look pretty good, I think.

Oh rad. I hit my goal. I even made a little money.

Oh fuck. Now I need a new goal. Now I need to get published in a pro magazine.

That’s where I’m shooting now. I’m looking around at a lot of the names in the places I’ve got pieces upcoming and I see a trend: a lot of people hit a streak like me where they may have been working for years, but once they hit that first sale, within a year they’ll have three or six or ten. A few of them, like me, are just hitting that streak. Others did it a few years back and might have a couple dozen stories out there. Of these, some have a listing or two in a pro mag.

Presumably, of this sub-subset, a fewer still go on to sell novels for fat stacks, make Big Names for themselves, get laid nonstop by sci-fi groupies, etc. I’ll do that. For now, the next step, I think, is to crack those pro markets. Wish me luck.

Share this:

“10%” just got picked up by The Future Fire. Looks like it’ll be running in their June issue, meaning I got two stories appearing next month. Let the preparations for intense self-Googling begin.

That’s four acceptances in the last three months. My formerly robust supply of unpublished works has dwindled to a mere five pieces–I’m sitting on the welcome problem of selling faster than I can write. Clearly the solution is to bounce my future submissions through a gauntlet of pro zines before trying anywhere else; in the time it takes them to rack up all those rejections, I can build up a new backlog of material. Andale.

Share this:

It took me two and a half weeks rather than two, but my latest story, “When We Were Mutants,” is finished. I think that’s my all-time favorite title. It’s actually the first time I’ve come up with the title first and written a story around that.

I’ve currently got just two stories out in submission with another four waiting to get blasted back into circulation, a cosmic imbalance I intend to correct over the next 24 hours. We shall see if the veritable laundry list of publication credits I’ve stumbled into the last couple months has any effect on their success. Guessing: no.

Share this:

Sold “The Long Hunt” to Tower of Light. Clearly on to something here. Plan: spend more on champagne than I made from the sale.

Share this:

Recently had “Every Song Is a Love Song” accepted by OG’s Speculative Fiction, a midmarket magazine that I like for reasons I’ve forgotten.

This is my fourth sale now, all of which have come in the last year, a condition which I have probably unreasonably interpreted to mean I’ve hit the point in my career where most of what I write will eventually end up published somewhere. I still write the occasional piece of garbage, and I currently have more stories in submission than placed–barely–but given the ratio of stories written : stories accepted, it feels as if I am doing something right. Needless to say this is an extremely new sensation.

Propelled by stupidity, I’ve decided to write a new short story every two weeks, a pace that’s twice as fast as the best I’ve mustered in the past. The extra-smart part of this plan is I launched it just as I was getting into a new relationship. Failure ahoy? Oh, you better believe it.

I am currently on pace through New Story #2. If I’m finishing New Story #15 at the end of December, I will be mightily impressed. Bonus points if I haven’t alienated everyone I know.

Share this:

It’s hardly new, but in October my short fantasy story “The Werewolf of Narashtovik” ran in Reflection’s Edge. I forget whether I’ve mentioned RE before, but I like them, and not just because their editor seems to like me. They’re a broad-genre webzine that runs about six times a year. Good place for unpublished authors. And needless to say, their taste is impeccable.

I’ve got another short slated for M-Brane. Think it’ll be issue #5, in June. This is a young mag run by an interesting guy with a good head on his shoulders and the ambition to turn it into a pro magazine (if that happens, I should probably suggest retroactive pay bumps for all former contributors–that’s how these things are done, right?). I can see myself submitting there again.

The local paper has granted me a second column about weird, cult, and otherwise interesting-but-little-known movies. I honestly don’t know the URL for the web version yet. Will dig that out later. Had to cut my day job down the four days a week to keep up with all the work I’m doing for the Herald, which means I am 20% of the way towards my dream of not working at all.

Finished a story last night for a Jim Baen’s Universe contest. Will no doubt fail, but I mostly wanted a deadline for myself.

There’s the last six months. Could have been worse.

Share this:

In my obsession with perfectly duplicating the Shangri-laesque environment of the far-off time of the early ’90s, I don’t have an internet connection at home. For emergencies, i.e. when I mail in my columns three times a week, I’m able to wander out into the backyard and steal my neighbor’s connection with my laptop, but other than that, it’s work-only.

Running a blog, then, is a pretty stupid idea, but then again I don’t plan to do very much with it. In fact I’m so dedicated to doing nothing here I’ve already gone back and deleted a couple dozen old posts. You think the remaining material is unnecessary and drossy, you should have seen what got cut.

So I’m restarting this here thing, if only so when I drunkenly boast to girls that I’m a writer and they politely ask if I’ve been published, I can write down this address for them and they can politely never visit it. It’s a win for both sides.

Expect updates when I actually have news to report.

Share this:

I’m a huge sucker-chump for big endings, be they tragic or triumphant. That’s part of why, despite the humorous pay and the fact the hours eat big chunks of my weekend, being a movie critic is my #2 dream job. Once or twice a week, I get paid to go watch something that makes me all excited to be alive.

My kryptonite-like weakness for the big ending means I have to try extra hard to not overrate them once it’s reviewing time. Even something like Speed Racer, which I though looked great but mostly sucked, can get me amped up beyond all reason. I have to sit down and say Hey, me, yes, Speed won the big race, but remember how bored and annoyed you were through most of it? Remember how Spritle made you want to kill babies just in case they grew up to be like him? Remember all that? Okay, good, because I know the last scene you saw was pretty good, but the 130 minutes before that most decidedly were not.

Things get trickier with a movie like David Mamet’s Redbelt. The first two thirds are good, if a bit light on tension; the last third takes it up several notches; the ending feels close to transcendent. I’m certain it’s at least fairly good and possibly great, but how much of that is objective thought and how much is the post-coital glow of a decent story with a big emotional swell of an ending?

I’m honestly not sure yet; due to the laughable nonexistence of area movie screenings, I just caught it yesterday, and my review’s just half done. In concrete terms, it could end up anywhere from a B to an A- (though I’m leaning toward the upper end of the scale), which might sound like a fine distinction but carries a wide degree of difference–in my insular, moving-picture-addled mind, at least.

Trusting myself to pull together the right balance of the emotions I felt while watching it with the colder thoughts I had in the day or two afterwards is something I’m still working on. I guess you could say it’s the hard part of the job. That and forcing myself to go see “can’t possibly be good but can’t possibly be bad in a fun way either” fare like Made of Honor. I skipped that one, but by the time the year’s up, I’m sure I’ll have seen ten just like it. Remember that when you think I’ve got it easy, pal. Even when half of it consists of sitting in a dark room watching stories unfold on a house-sized screen, a job is always a job.

Now if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got a party hat, three bottles of champagne, and a stack of DVDs to attend to.

Share this:

I’ve been reading a lot of agents blogs lately, as much for the insight about the job as to keep up with the reading schedules of the couple I’ve submitted The White Tree to. As useful as getting a degree in fiction was (and I really don’t appreciate the laughter here), the classroom taught me little to nothing about the business side of being a novelist. I knew the basics of why you want an agent and what they can do for you as an author, yeah, but as for the ins and outs–how they work, what they’re like, how you can get their attention–there’s been a constant cartoon question mark floating over my head which didn’t start to shrink until I’d read many thousands of their words.

It’s also helped humanize them. To an inexperience author, agents are a bit like elves, in that they’re elusive and mysterious, and also somewhat like ogres, in that they’re scary and powerful and it’s easy to imagine them reading your query, booming with laughter, then ripping the flesh from a whole shank of mutton before dispatching one of their many crows to caw “Sorry, not right for us” right in your ear.

It’s good, then, to be reminded they’re just normal people. Normal people with the potential to launch your authorial career, yes, but if they say no, it’s certainly not because they’re sadists or monsters. As frustrating as it is to read a rejection as vague as “The story just didn’t grab me” or “I just don’t feel strongly enough about it to be able to represent it effectively,” that’s probably the exact reason they’re passing. (Also, because their schedule’s too full of baby-eating to find the time to work up a proposal for your book.)

So mostly I really like reading what they have to say, and was taken aback when I saw, in more than one place, that agents don’t want to see you talking about getting rejected on your blog. Boy are my ears red!

It’s true that the only thing America hates worse than a loser is a cheater. If an agent sees your book’s been turned down by fifty other agencies, she won’t be too upset to be the 51st. Even Miss Snark said she didn’t want to see you talking about rejection unless it was to reminisce after you’d become a published author, which I found hilarious, in an exasperating way. It seemed to be saying two things: first, that everyone gets rejected at least a few times and often a whole lot of times, but let’s all pretend you’re perfect until you’re too big to be hurt by admitting someone once thought you weren’t worth their time; and second, we’re probably going to turn you down even if we think you’re pretty good (numbers are nigh-on impossible to come by, but one average-sized agency turns down 99.75% of the submissions they receive), but right or wrong, we sure as hell don’t want to hear about it later.

Let me just say that I totally, completely and utterly understand the reasons why talking about rejection is annoying at best and self-destructive at worst. (With the exception of anything and everything I have to say here, obviously.) I’ve read some unagented authors’ blogs and learned just how strong the bitterness is in us ones. Cheaters and losers are the leaders of the Hate Pack, but whiners nip right at their heels.

Nobody wants to read about what a tasteless prick Agent Moron is, let alone one of his colleagues who might have been thinking about asking to see the rest of your book until you’d just expressed the belief all agents are human sewers. A lot of writers take rejection very, very personally, even when it’s a polite and contrite form letter; I’ve read in several places that the fact people are often so angry, defensive, and insulting when an agent or editor offers them constructive criticism is the very reason most of them don’t. Seething and complaining just makes you look like the jerk. Just like James Bond, you’ve got to never let them see you bleed.

Because, you know, it’s not personal. Rejection’s a fact. Nobody likes saying no any more than we like hearing it, but it has to happen. There’s a thousand stories about the writer who was turned down a billion times and today he’s the King of Authoria. A year after his first book came out, everyone loves Pat Rothfuss, but back in the day The Name of the Wind was rejected by every agent in Christendom. (Well, by 25, I think, which is both a lot and not very many at all.) And some day, if the writing’s good enough, someone will take that chance on it.

Flip side of the coin: I’m not sure anyone who hasn’t been through this understands just how rough it is to keep hearing “No.”

I might know I’m the motherfucking bomb, but unless the People Who Matter (i.e. agents and editors) agree with me, my monumental greatness makes no difference at all. The easy answer is to persevere until you find that enlightened arbiter who will slap her colleagues across the face with your manuscript until they fall to their knees in tears and line up to offer you an eighty-book contract. After all: good writing shines through. Keep writing, keep submitting, and eventually you’ll reach the ears of the one person who matters.

But of course art and entertainment isn’t quantifiable. You can’t really know you’re worth printing. Everyone who sends a query to an agent or a story to an editor believes (or at least hopes) they are, but at best you’ve had some friends or your critique group tell you they like your work, which means next to nothing because they sure as shit can’t tell you they hate it, and even if they did you’d just write them off as morons. Before you’re regularly in print, really all you’ve got to go by is the People Who Matter, and if the People Who Matter keep telling you “No,” sooner or later you’re going to reach the conclusion either they’re all crazy and wrong, or–crushingly, devastatingly–you’re just not all that good.

It’s a long wearing-down, an erosion of confidence, the grinding of all outward evidence that says you’re not good enough against whatever’s driving you on to write no matter what the outcome. It’s stress, stress, stress. Stress causes fraying, breaks in your nerve and your cool.

We worry that we’ll sit down on this new novel and give it all the energy and free time we can muster until a year or three later when at last it’s done, and we’ll send it out, and still nobody wants it. That fear’s killed more half-finished novels than all the other time-sucking responsibilities and relationships and real jobs combined. Probably a good thing. Too many of us wannabes as it is.

There’s always the hope that you’re learning and developing, that the next one you write will be the one. I once read a poll on an author’s site asking other authors how many books they wrote before they had one published. For most, it was more than one; for many it was three or four; for some it was six or eight or ten. Sanity’s as hard to quantify as artistic merit, but if you’ve written ten books and nobody’s bought one, that might be a sign. On the one hand, there’s probably not much that can stop someone who’s written ten books from writing the eleventh. On the other, it’s either very hilarious or very sad to consider how many times they’ve heard “No.”

Good art’s kind of like obscenity, but with less risk of ejaculation. You might not be able to define it, but you know it when you see it. With anything you can’t quantify, though, it helps to know someone else has already decided the work in question doesn’t suck. Agents are very right when they say it only takes one yes. People are–and this is usually a good thing–herd animals. If Someone Who Matters gets you that book deal, or prints your story in their universally respected and beloved magazine, that fact alone will make Someone Else Who Matters all the more likely to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Conversely, if Someone Who Matters stumbles on your blog where you admit being turned down right and left, well, good luck convincing them to take you seriously.

So. I know we’re not supposed to talk about rejection. I know it’s unprofessional and unseemly, that insecurity is unattractive. Anyway, it’s almost impossible to talk about it without whining, bitching, moaning, or otherwise making yourself look petty or clueless or deluded. It’s a terrible idea and only an idiot would indulge in it.

But one of the reasons I write–and I really, really doubt I’m alone–is because sometimes I have feelings I can’t deal very well with in real life, but if I translate those emotions into fiction, it makes them a whole hell of a lot less scary. I don’t know that Freud ever really figured out artists, but it’s just another form of repetition compulsion, putting something big and hard to handle in an environment where you’re (more) in control. The idea isn’t to be transparently autobiographical. It’s just that when I write a character who in some way moves through the same emotional territory I have, suddenly the whole thing makes a certain amount of sense. Maybe the place to deal with rejection isn’t the internet, but in fiction. Still: it wears on you.

“Shrug it off and send it somewhere else.” That’s the advice the pros give, both agents and authors. Honestly, it is good advice. Hope springs eternal that Agent Brilliant will see what Agent Arbitrary passed on. And really, in the scheme of things, one rejection means nothing. That individual could just have different tastes, or be in a bad mood, or too busy, or not know an editor who’d be interested, or maybe they really are just a fool without the ability to understand what you’ve got here.

But as the herd gets bigger and the “No” gets louder, it gets harder and harder to ignore what they’re saying. We’re not individuals, we’re sheep, too. We want to be with that herd. All those other guys aren’t saying “No” for their health, it’s because they believe it, and maybe we should stop holding out already and get over to their side of the pasture. But the only thing that hurts worse than constantly convincing ourselves they’re all wrong is starting to believe they might be right.

It’s more of a wading through than a shrugging off. The energy just keeps on coming, which is proof in itself that John Gardner was on to something when he said all fiction should be life-affirming. Today I wrote a movie review. Put this together, for whatever it’s worth. It’s 2:23 in the morning and I’m about to dive into a short story and not stop until sunrise. Tomorrow, I’ll get together some queries for this new draft of The White Tree. The book’s good. People will want to read it. There’s just two more things I need to do: keep going until it finds a home, and try not to be too obnoxious until it does.

Share this:

After yet another draft of the first chapter–a half-draft, really, maybe even draft 5.1; all I did was brush up two scenes which have stubbornly resisted all my prior attempts to make them good–I gave it yet another read, and at the end of those first eleven pages, I was troubled by a feeling I couldn’t place.

On further reflection, it turned out I liked it. Chapter One, I felt, had finally become Chapter Pretty Fucking Good. This, after giving long and serious consideration to chopping it down and turning it into a prologue, or just deleting it altogether and squeezing it into a paragraph of exposition in chapter two. Ultimately, I did neither–there’s some plot-critical info there, and though I think the book gets stronger once the secondary character shows up in chapter two, the contrast of the main character’s existence before he has this friend is an important part of the greater meaning of the book. Hmm, excuse me a moment; I appear to have a lump of pretension stuck in my throat.

Much better. Long story short: I’m so (probably unreasonably, certainly temporarily) satisfied with the work that I’m starting to submit it in earnest. In the agents search, two things pop out at me: 1) lots of agents are accepting e-queries these days, and 2) many of them want to see nothing but the one-page query letter–no synopses or writing samples except by request.

1) is mostly a positive. I like paper submissions, I think they’re tangible and thus less dismissable than email, if only infinitesimally so, but on the other hand, e-queries save postage and paper, and most importantly of all, they shave a week or more from the response time.

It turns out waiting is one of the most important skills of the professional writer, probably but not necessarily ranked just after a) the ability to write well and b) the ability to revise. It is also far and away the most odious and nerve-wracking part of the business. Also, in case of the ever-present threat of rejection, it just delays you from sending it on to someone who might appreciate it more. Anything to shave down the wait-time is to be highly esteemed, if not worshiped outright.

2) One page queries–no sir, I don’t like them. So far, I’m 2/2 on parlaying one pagers into requests for partial manuscripts (neither of which I’ve heard back on yet, despite one being out since mid-January; yay, waiting), and I understand an agent can tell a lot from the 200-300 words that go into a query, but man, query letters are like the exact opposite of fiction.

Query letters are pure exposition, total infodump. The totality of your book and who you are as a writer must somehow be compressed into a teeny tiny fraction of either. Good fiction, obviously, is about relaying information in ways that feel naturalistic and subtle–as the subtext in dialogue, as a vague, fleeting reference in the middle of a scene, as a feeling that emerges despite never being mentioned. Any scene in a novel that in any way resembled the naked exposition of a query letter would be laughed at, scorned, then laughed at some more–and rightly so.

Also, the need to just crank all that information out there results in an extreme departure from my normal writing style. I kind of really doubt I’m alone in that. A competent query might let an agent know the writer can at least string coherent sentences together (and maybe that’s all it takes for them to request a partial), but it kind of rankles to think professionals are making an initial judgment of your work before they’ve seen a single word of it.

One of Miss Snark’s finest rules is “Query widely.” There’s lots of agents out there, and to paraphrase (because I forget the real phrasing) her most important rule, Good writing shines through. I have no doubt that’s true, and in defense of The System, agents are totally swamped with unrequested material of highly questionable value (to the point where “slushpile” is probably one of the most polite terms for it). The one-page initial query exists, most likely, to cut down on the time agents spend reading utter nonsensical garbage, leaving them more time to deal with the queries with potential, and also these things I hear they have called clients–you know, the guys who make them the actual money.

Still, it’s one more layer to slog through on the way from being Joe Bleats About His Wonderful and Unappreciated Manuscript All Day to being Successful and Beloved Author, Esq. (Uh, these days, apparently publishing contracts bestow law degrees, too.) It’s that much more time we have to spend on the business side, the side we really need that agent for, rather than on the actual writing.

Again, though, agents are notoriously overworked. Nobody seems to like the current system; any agent interview or blog is likely to include a passionate screed about how crummy the whole process can be. In many ways, it’s not even unfair to writers; until we’re proven commodities, maybe it is us who should have to jump through the hoops, not the agents we so feverishly desire to work with.

Really, it probably is the best and most effective system we’ve got, and the one-page query is just a way to make the best use of an agents’ minimal time. Like that dude Candide said, though, if this is the best possible world, what must the others look like?

Share this:

About Me



I am a Science Fiction and Fantasy author, based in LA. Read More.

Archives

Featured Books
My Book GenresMy Book Series